Davin Jusik
TIE Bomber LT- DREX
Bwahahaha xD I died.
Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Sith Vote
- Thread starter Valiens Nantaris
- Start date
Christian Slade
In Darkness I Thrive
Snarky git, isn't he?Mikhail Shorn said:
Valiens Nantaris
Head Admin
It's not 2:1, it's only 2:1 against the nearest other option. It's a bare majority 52% at the moment.
The Admiralty
One man to rule them all. IC and OOC.
Darth Ferus
Wanderer
Saera Willamina Savan
~+--- Skaidra ---+~ Beskarsmith, Alchemist
There needs to be an 'Option 4: Go find something better to do. Because this is just ridiculous'. This is why the Sith doesn't work. Too much chat. Too little action. Seven pages of TL;DR.
Saera Willamina Savan
~+--- Skaidra ---+~ Beskarsmith, Alchemist
Also, I am speaking in relative perspective, you're speaking in whole.Tamara said:
2:1 averaged out in individual comparison. It's 2:1 average.
*goes to sleep*
The Lion King
Everone - please refrain from unnecessary spam in this thread. Only post stuff contributing to the discussion.
L Admin
No worries, I know who's been filling in for you ever since the Sith Empire buckled, and they're doing just fine at it.Ashin Varanin said:
Nothing stops this train.
In Umbris Potestas Est
I agree more along the lines of a gladitorial thing where all the Sith fight each other at the same time. With one restriction - Jedi can't come in and kill everyone just because they're together.
Derisive Umbaran
The One Sith have been running the first option, and they seem to be doing well from what I gather.
Whatever's going on over there, not having IC or OOC authority concentrated in one dude's hands is probably better in the long run. Might encourage people to be more active in their faction if they always have a say in what's going down.
Whatever's going on over there, not having IC or OOC authority concentrated in one dude's hands is probably better in the long run. Might encourage people to be more active in their faction if they always have a say in what's going down.
Cerusia Shamalain
Rorifaera
What Gerion said.
Seir'ari
Twi'lek Slaver
I know I'm not in the Sith faction, but we had issues like this in a community that I'm modding; there was supposed to be an "Omega Leader of Chaos" and the problem is that the faction stood to compete against 2 others, and it didn't have much appeal because the leader's mun went offline and never returned.
The system that we employed was to where it was an IC leader, but he was played by 3 elected players who decided on the specifics actions, behaviors, and ideals of the lord. They all shared the account and its password, and there would always be someone who could answer as the leader while no player knew exactly who those three people were, so there wouldn't be stress if one of them dropped off the radar for a while because the 'leader' would still be active as ever. He'd be usually pulled out for large events, though as the members got a better grasp on how this system worked he became a bit more commonplace and less worried about showing his face to the other veteran faction leaders.
It was an odd system but it worked considering that most of the issue about developing a leader was pride, as it is in the Sith community; if nobody knew who was manning the controls from behind, then there would be no favoritism and no incentive to abuse the power they gave themselves because they were constantly networking with one another OOC to keep the character consistent.
This isn't something I'm suggesting to you guys, nor am I saying for it to be included in the vote. I'm just noticing here and now that there's a lot of dissatisfaction because you guys are hoping bigtime to assume top-priority roles but nobody's willing to stand down. Maybe having a few muns put together to hash it out in OOC would be for the best, especially seeing as your needs and situation are unique to this given situation. And essentially this is the purpose of the voting system in place; to try and get you guys to realize that your desire to rebuild the Sith isn't something that only you have. You guys all want it to be restored, you just need to hash out the details and decide how it should be run.
The system that we employed was to where it was an IC leader, but he was played by 3 elected players who decided on the specifics actions, behaviors, and ideals of the lord. They all shared the account and its password, and there would always be someone who could answer as the leader while no player knew exactly who those three people were, so there wouldn't be stress if one of them dropped off the radar for a while because the 'leader' would still be active as ever. He'd be usually pulled out for large events, though as the members got a better grasp on how this system worked he became a bit more commonplace and less worried about showing his face to the other veteran faction leaders.
It was an odd system but it worked considering that most of the issue about developing a leader was pride, as it is in the Sith community; if nobody knew who was manning the controls from behind, then there would be no favoritism and no incentive to abuse the power they gave themselves because they were constantly networking with one another OOC to keep the character consistent.
This isn't something I'm suggesting to you guys, nor am I saying for it to be included in the vote. I'm just noticing here and now that there's a lot of dissatisfaction because you guys are hoping bigtime to assume top-priority roles but nobody's willing to stand down. Maybe having a few muns put together to hash it out in OOC would be for the best, especially seeing as your needs and situation are unique to this given situation. And essentially this is the purpose of the voting system in place; to try and get you guys to realize that your desire to rebuild the Sith isn't something that only you have. You guys all want it to be restored, you just need to hash out the details and decide how it should be run.
Christian Slade
In Darkness I Thrive
If it has nothing to do with you and you are annoyed by it then ignore it. No one's forcing you to come in here and read all of this just so you can get upset about it and start complaining. Just move along to the next thread and get on with your life.Særa Ayña Savan said:
L Admin
Your daily dose of realism, provided by Christian Slade.Christian Slade said:
Christian Slade
In Darkness I Thrive
You're welcome. It really grinds my gears when people actively search for something to hate or complain about.Nas Kraal said:
Saera Willamina Savan
~+--- Skaidra ---+~ Beskarsmith, Alchemist
*slow claps* I'm not upset, just enlightened. *grins*Christian Slade said:
By the way, this is Ashe, your fellow compatriot....
#TruthHurts
Darth Ferus
Wanderer
Simply pointing out something real quick. Disclaimer though, I don't have any intentions on uniting the Sith. Krest won't do that (Not yet at least)
Saying that this chat is pointless and saying that people should take action and unite the Sith instead of posting here is very.. Hypocritical? If you're not going to do it, don't complain that no one else will. It's not going to be served to you on a golden platter.
At least, that's how my old RP site went when it came to RP. Instead of complaining that x isn't happening, make it happen. Cause in the end you're just looking selfish.
Point over \o/
Saying that this chat is pointless and saying that people should take action and unite the Sith instead of posting here is very.. Hypocritical? If you're not going to do it, don't complain that no one else will. It's not going to be served to you on a golden platter.
At least, that's how my old RP site went when it came to RP. Instead of complaining that x isn't happening, make it happen. Cause in the end you're just looking selfish.
Point over \o/
Saera Willamina Savan
~+--- Skaidra ---+~ Beskarsmith, Alchemist
"Actions, not Words."
It's not my place or desire for it to be to lead or unite anything, so I'm fine.
It's not my place or desire for it to be to lead or unite anything, so I'm fine.
But this just rectifies my point.Krest said: