Bernard the Elder




I believe you three specifically are talking about the same concerns. Its not about the bounty toggle either. Its about the interpretation of consent. The bounty toggle is only "problematic" cause it simplifies "consent", But there is no one shared definition or perspective on consent for this system. I think that is the real issue.
Which is 100% valid, sure, cause we all pour time and energy into our characters and their interactions. BUT this is collaborative RP after all and for example: Many unique writers come together, collab all that uniqueness and make a major faction. Major factions are held accountable for the actions of its members as a whole cuz majors represent a consensus , not sole individuals. That would defeat its purpose.
Open threads, public threads and faction threads are also the same concept and there is no expectation of privacy in public. Or at least expectation will be greatly diminished. Once you enter a public space, the story isn't just yours anymore and a "disruption" is not a "violation", it becomes participation.
Im reading that the quality of said"Disruption" or "Participation" matters and i do believe there is a difference between the two. But a fear of narrative loss of control aka "Ownership" is unavoidable in Open RP. You only have the power to React, Adapt and Shift motivations really, unless your in a private thread. IC and OOC, "problems" dont have to just be problems. They can be used as further opportunities and thats the the point of collaboration. The mature part of collaborative RP is the ability to let go of authorship. Which is hilarious because its an illusion when you look at it from this perspective.
"Problems are just opportunities that haven't presented themselves." ~ Insert some wise person here
Disclaimer: This is my perspective through my years being on SWRP. My view simplifies things and may exclude specific details.
Last edited: