Senator of Atzerri

Interesting question.
While it seemed that many were not interested in talking, which was fine, he rarely spoke to anyone but his aids, or his family on Theed(he’s fairly blunt), Arcann visibly responded to @Pinda Solthar’s question about the greatest threat to the Republic.
He had been on a holocall with his wife when she asked, so was not able to hear it the first time, only catching the replay when it came to the response of Rep. Findos.
Arcann found the question about the greatest threat to the High Republic to be quite intriguing. To him, the framing of such a question revealed a deep, underlying political weakness in the Republic—an inability to fully confront the myriad external and internal dangers without deflecting or overcompensating. It spoke, at least to him, to the idealism that drives the Republic but also to its vulnerability, particularly in the face of hardened threats like the Sith and the rising threat of the Black Sun, even the Imperial Confederation to a much lesser extent.
Really? Speaking out amongst the other Senators and Representatives around him, though again, to no one in particular, he sighed. Arcann found Sentapoth’s response to be a bit underwhelming. While the Nemodian made an attempt to position himself as a cautious leader who would rely on the advice of intelligence agencies, he seemed to lack a clear, decisive stance on the immediate threats to the Republic. Either this was a weakness on his part… or…
... he’s being pragmatic to try and garner votes. I can respect that… but we only need look to our Western Border…
By focusing on internal divisions, Arcann began to see Sentapoth more as a politician who is more concerned with keeping his image clean and appeasing the electorate rather than taking bold, necessary action to confront true, external dangers. Nothing wrong with that, it is good for the body politic, but the leader?
Hmmm.
While he did appreciate the subtle jab at Kalantha's ties to the nobility, recognizing the political maneuvering at play. It was not something necessarily that the Senator from Atzerri would employ. He was a man of simple origins, sure, but is it the former Queen’s fault that she comes from the family she does?
Then it was time for Kalantha's response, and it hit pretty well with Arcann in some ways. They seemed to share in the call and desire on and for unity and the Republic’s internal cohesion, recognizing that division can indeed be a powerful, destructive force. The problem with that is that he was bothered by the idealistic approach. Cynicism? Mayber, but it seemed to be more political, like Findos’ comments, meant to grab cheers, than a true approach.
Oh come on…
The way Kalantha spoke of the Sith, Mandalorians, and other threats as mere challenges that could be overcome by unity was naive, no two ways about it. Perhaps it was her age, perhaps it was her noble heritage, perhaps it was the fact that he was once a soldier in far too many wars, it didn’t matter. To Arcann, the Sith represent a constant existential danger, not just a divisive element.
That seemed to bother the Senator more than anything, even drawing a level of suspicion from him of her choice to frame division as the biggest threat. It subtly redirected the focus away from the Republic’s own structural flaws and the real challenges posed by the galaxy.
He didn’t like her rhetoric, but as Findos was being pragmatic, Arcann saw Kalantha as being strategic in her move to appeal to both the common people and the nobility, all while avoiding directly acknowledging the true threats that loomed on the horizon.
Arcann definitely saw this question as a telling tale of both candidates true intentions. Sentapoth, though more self-aware, comes across as a politician who fears taking bold stands, while Kalantha seems to rely on emotional appeals that could ultimately fail to address the very real dangers that lurk in the galaxy.
Can’t help but wonder if either of them truly get it…



