Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jedi and Sith: What's the Difference?

imo the jedi code seems to equate the force with intellectualism and the harder degrees of absolute morality at the cost of emotion. To this end, a jedi can do bad things as a means to an end, of what may or may not be good intentions, and so long as he keeps emotions from influencing him, he can technically remain a jedi all the while.

This was most likely the root cause to the decline of the jedi order as a whole in episodes one and 2, as they abandoned their moralities as a means to an end to face the (manufactured) separatist threat. This in combination with the individual moral failings of jedi who turned to the dark side, and in switching, gave into their emotions as a means of dumping the jedi ways/ pure intellectualism, caused in the more overt examples of how jedi were falling to the dark side.

The sith code, conversely, values emotional perception/ misconception, and power and control as an end-all/be-all end-goal and result. intellectual thinking is at best, an afterthought and/or a way to find justifications and methods for gaining power and control over others for feel-good-isms and self-delusions. Morality is at best a vastly distant 3rd, and is very much a subjective relativity, if even bothered with at all. (usually it isnt)

Notoriously, the Sith are INFAMOUS for in-fighting, catty powerplaying and hierarchical jockying, and even with the rule of 2 instated, the endless backstabbing, betrayal, and cold war treachery between master and apprentice was made the rule, rather than an intrinsic byproduct, side effect or feature that happened to be the norm anyway.
 

Flint Pherson

Guest
F
Daxton Bane said:
Wait a minute so where does this put the Dark Jedi?
Last I heard? A Dark Jedi was anybody who used to be a real Jedi but then quit to do their own thing. Though. There are many cults that simply call themselves 'Dark Jedi' for kicks and giggles. Never having been Jedi themselves. So. It's a loose term that can be vary vague.
 
No what I meant was those on the board with the title Dark Jedi. Does this mean they saw the flaw in the Jedi's orders teachings and embraced the ways of the Sith?
 
No, it means they lacked the mind for spiritual things and left the order to toil in the futility that is the material world. The only distinction between a Dark Jedi and a Sith is personal identification and acceptance of the choices one has made.
 

Jsc

Disney's Princess
Tyger Tyger said:
No, it means they lacked the mind for spiritual things and left the order to toil in the futility that is the material world. The only distinction between a Dark Jedi and a Sith is personal identification and acceptance of the choices one has made.
Good enough! *thumbs up*
 

Qae Shena

Super Shaper Puppy!
Nooot true. A Sith is devoted to a specific set of tenets and their intent; IE, the pursuit of power, no matter what kind, is their ultimate goal and they would do anything to get there. A Dark Jedi can basically do whatever they want and not care about power. Hell, they can be focused on helping people but be cruel in their methods. Altruistic, but twisted.
 
Allaina Mare said:
Nooot true. A Sith is devoted to a specific set of tenets and their intent; IE, the pursuit of power, no matter what kind, is their ultimate goal and they would do anything to get there. A Dark Jedi can basically do whatever they want and not care about power. Hell, they can be focused on helping people but be cruel in their methods. Altruistic, but twisted.
The intent to inflict your will, your sense of what's right, upon the cosmos is not only a pursuit of power, but a flexing of it. The distinction is arbitrary and a matter of spin, particularly when they condescend so as to use popular Sith tactics like Murder and Force Lightning.

If you live for the soul, you cannot die (as evidenced by Qui-Gon, Yoda, and Obi-Wan). When you live for the body, you cling to a deteriorating corpse (as evidenced by Grievous, Vader, and Darth Sion).
 

Ludo Dorian

Guest
L
Naadi Maaro said:
The sith code, conversely, values emotional perception/ misconception, and power and control as an end-all/be-all end-goal and result. intellectual thinking is at best, an afterthought and/or a way to find justifications and methods for gaining power and control over others for feel-good-isms and self-delusions. Morality is at best a vastly distant 3rd, and is very much a subjective relativity, if even bothered with at all. (usually it isnt)
I disagree with this. The Sith's tenets at their core have long been stirred over by intellectuals. It's basically Nietzschean philosophy.

I also wouldn't say that Sith completely lack morals either. I think the biggest difference between the Sith and the Jedi is that the Jedi believe in equality and stasis, while the Sith have a heirarchial view of the galaxy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom