Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Discussion Be the change - A new faction perhaps?

:: HERO of KORRIBAN ::
Judah Lesan Judah Lesan well said! That is very true.

I meant more like I’ve seen people be on board for an idea but then pull back because “I don’t like writer x.” But then we get small groups with the same ideas that won’t play together.

I understand wanting to only hang out with people you like. This is a hobby. I just thought maybe it was worth noting maybe try to give someone a chance and see if maybe you really end up having fun in the faction, even if the brains behind it was not your first choice cup of tea.

I hope that made sense. I think I’m rambling.

Ahhh gotcha. I mean some people aren’t as bad as you think they are… some factions are cooler when you give them a chance. That’s a good perspective.

you-are-not-my-mother-mother.gif

I’m just her prisoner…
 
Something I think is worth mentioning about clout.

I’ve noticed sometimes ideas don’t even get off the ground because of who started them. Maybe we could be a little more flexible and give folks a chance.

I’m not taking the trouble makers and I do not mean staff and MFO choices. Those are above my pay grad.

I just mean maybe support the members with “less clout” at the minor stage. That might help the ideas grow.
What ideas?
 
Sʜᴀᴅᴏᴡ Lᴏʀᴅ
Exclusion is the enemy of us all.
I wanted to ask staff for some guidance on what advice we should give writers who are struggling to establish themselves or find consistent roleplay within the community.

Communities naturally form friendships and familiar writing circles, and no one can be expected to participate in every story, accept every character concept, or respond to every request. At the same time, some writers have told me that they struggle to find connections even after posting advertisements, joining open threads, approaching factions, responding to planning discussions, or reaching out to other writers.

My interest is in helping foster a welcoming environment where writers have a fair opportunity to share their ideas, meet potential writing partners, and become involved in ongoing stories. I would also like to help people distinguish between ordinary difficulties finding compatible partners and situations where they may need to change how they are approaching the community.

I have tried to contribute by creating additional storytelling opportunities, inviting less-established writers into discussions, encouraging people to share their ideas, and redirecting conversations away from general complaints and toward practical solutions.

What specific advice would staff recommend giving writers who have made repeated efforts but still feel overlooked? For example, should they be directed toward particular forums, faction spaces, roleplay advertisements, open threads, community events, or methods of approaching other writers?

Are there also common mistakes that may make it harder for someone to receive responses, such as unclear advertisements, overly narrow concepts, joining too many threads at once, or approaching people without enough information about the story they would like to propose?

I would like to make sure the guidance I offer is practical, constructive, respectful of everyone's personal boundaries, and consistent with the site's expectations.
While the topic is about the creation of a new faction I would like to suggest that, perhaps, reviving an old faction could be a great way to create roleplay and drum up interest. I've seen mentions of a rebellion faction. In 2025 a rebellion faction went Major called the Tingel Arm Coalition. While it seems that the writers (who created TAC) are now into the Farworlds Alliance (and trying to get that faction to go Major) perhaps a new group of writers could takeover where TAC left-off and if there is enough momentum perhaps the FA writers (who used to be in TAC) would have interest in writing their old characters again.
The FA is a continuation of the natural roleplay progression of the characters involved in TAC. I also have documented roleplays showing that the same core group of roughly five to seven writers has been telling stories together since before TAC and continues to do so now.

We intend to continue building narratives and writing together regardless of whether the faction ever gains a place on the map. We are also actively reaching out to other groups and writers to plan collaborative threads, shared plots, and cross-faction storytelling opportunities.
 
Well I think the latest rebel factions are a good example. When I was wrangling people to try and start something I got a lot of “it depends on who leads it.”

I get that to an extent but at the same time I feel like if we gave people a chance we might be surprised.

Does that make sense?

I can see this both ways, to be honest. I'm 100% for giving people a chance, but I do NOT blame writers for this perspective. I won't invalidate what someone else has been through, nor will we as Staff ever dictate who people "can" and "can't" write with outside of the obvious behavioral issues. There have been times when we have had to tell members to stay away from each other because they mix like oil and water.

But I feel the sentiment you're putting forward in my bones. Some people won't write with me just because I primarily write Sith, or the most common reason: My username is blue. So, I get it. It's just that, unfortunately, most people who have that perspective just aren't ready to move on yet. We can't force them, or we're inviting drama/arguing/reports that could be just as detrimental.

Just because someone is ready to be forgiven doesn't mean that the community is ready to forgive. It takes time - if ever - and it's with that in mind that everyone should have the right to choose who they do and do not want to interact with.
 
Well I think the latest rebel factions are a good example. When I was wrangling people to try and start something I got a lot of “it depends on who leads it.”

I get that to an extent but at the same time I feel like if we gave people a chance we might be surprised.

Does that make sense?

Yes, but I think for some people the chance (and the second and third and fourth chances) have come and gone already. There are people who are fundamentally not compatible, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. Still, in a perfect world?
 

Kitter Bitters

Creator of the Bitterverse
I agree with you both. I get it. I really do. I’m guilty of it too. It’s just one of those maybe if you can try? But if you can’t then trust your gut.
 
I’ve noticed sometimes ideas don’t even get off the ground because of who started them. Maybe we could be a little more flexible and give folks a chance.
I don't think the takeaway from this should be that it is personal, although I am sure there are examples of individuals with personal issues with other individuals, it is that you build a reputation here and if your reputation doesn't lend itself to a consistent and active presence you aren't going to draw much support from people because that is the bare minimum requirement to run a faction.

I also do not think this is actually even true. Most of the LFG threads I have browsed over the last month, specifically those looking to start new groups, have largely had most people inquiring about the specific nature of those groups - like an LFG I responded to a week or two ago about rebel stuff. None of them had any posts of "who is running this" aside from maybe looking at what characters are involved to get an idea on what sort of things such groups will be up to; largely because every LFG thread I've read has failed to actually disclose anything specific aside from "this will be an X faction/group".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom