Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Approved Starship UT-65 U-Wing Starfighter/Transport

Status
Not open for further replies.
UT-65 U-WING STARFIGHTER/TRANSPORT
ZKj5U1b.jpg

OUT OF CHARACTER INFORMATION
Intent: To create a new model U-Wing
Image Source: [x]
Canon Link: UT-60D U-Wing Starfighter/Support Craft
Permissions: Not Applicable
Primary Source: U-Wing Transport (60T)


PRODUCTION INFORMATION
Manufacturer: Incom Corporation | The Resistance
Model: UT-65
Affiliation: Closed-Market
Production: Minor
Material:

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Classification: Starfighter
Length: 24.98 Meters
Width: 34.25 Meters
Height: 3.35 Meters
Armament: Average

[High Full Power to Weapons]
  • Heavy Laser Cannons (2)
  • Variable Payload Warhead Launcher (1)
  • Infantry-Based Heavy Door Turrets (2)
  • Ground-Buzzer Light Blaster Cannon (1)
Defenses: High
[Very High Full Power to Shields]
Squadron Count: Average
Minimum Crew: Astromech Droid
Optimum Crew: 4 + Astromech Droid
Passenger Capacity: 16
Cargo Capacity: 500 Kilograms
Consumables: 10 Days
Maneuverability Rating: Low
Speed Rating: Average

[High Full Power to Engines]
Hyperdrive: Yes
Hyperdrive Class: 1.0


SPECIAL FEATURES
Hyperdrive System
Stealth Systems
Strengths:
  • Power Converter: New Incom Models now include Power Converters and a small reserve Power Generator, which allows them to boost one of their combat systems in battle, or assist with a rapid startup sequence.
  • Passive Long Range Stealth: Energy Dampeners, Static Dampeners, and Emission dampeners allow the UT-65 model to fly under stealth conditions and hide from most sensors at long range. In order to do this it cannot use its power converters, fire weaponry, or have active shields.
  • Transport: The U-Wing carries a squadron of troopers directly into combat, operating as a Fighter capable of providing close air support and delivering soldiers into combat.
Weaknesses:
  • Unassigned Energy: In combat, the reserve power must be assigned by the pilot or droid or it is not utilized or directed. This means when ambushed by enemy craft, the vessel is not able to perform at its full potential for a time.
  • One System at a Time: The fighter’s power converter can only direct its reserve power to a single combat system at a time, taking several seconds to stop the flow of energy to one system, redirect it, and begin the flow of energy to the next system.
  • Limited Stealth: The New Incom Line has minor stealth capabilities, but the fighter must power down weapons and shields, and cannot boost engines in order to evade enemy sensors at long range. The system is ineffective at normal ranges.
  • Door Guns: The Door guns are normally only fired in Type I or II atmospheres as otherwise opening the doors to use them would depressurize the craft or draw power from the other systems to maintain its life support.
  • Ponderous: Much larger than the X-Wing, the U-Wing is more ponderous with stiffer handling and a much larger profile, making it easier to hit by enemy craft.
DESCRIPTION
As part of Incom’s new line of Starfighters, the UT-60 U-Wing has undergone similar modernization and modification with assistance from Alderaan Engineering. The UT-65 Starfighter/Transport is a multi-role capable of filling the roles of dogfighter, close air support, and attack shuttle. Its computer and sensor systems were updated to current technological standards, and its engines built to be more fuel efficient to allow the vessel to act as a long range transport or light freighter if need be.

The UT-65’s primary weapon systems are a pair of heavy laser cannons mounted on the nose of the ship, supported by a pair of door-mounted heavy anti-infantry turrets such as repeating blaster cannons or ion cannons. These door turrets aren’t able to be used in space or high altitudes without depressurizing the craft or drawing power away from other essential systems to project atmospheric shields, leading to them normally only being used while providing close air support to enemy targets. A single variable payload warhead launcher is mounted on the UT-65, capable of loading anywhere from three proton rockets to six concussion missile or any variation or combination of similarly sized projectiles. Finally, like all modern Incom designs, it features a concealed underslung ground buzzer light blaster cannon turret to fire at approaching ground forces or pursuing craft.

As an upgrade from the older models and based from the TR-20 X-wing design aspects, the UT-65 Model features a reduced sensor signature assisted by energy, static, and emission dampeners that allow the vessel to operate under stealth conditions. When doing so its weapons and shields must be powered down, and the ship’s power converter cannot be directed. In doing so, the passive stealth allows the ship to hide from most sensors and scanners while at long range, but is rendered ineffective at close range and engagement ranges.

The main difference between the UT-65 Model and previous Incom designs is the Power Converter and Reserve Power Generator, a concept borrowed from Alderaan Engineering and miniaturized for starfighters. This Converter and reserve power allows the pilot of the UT-65 to amplify their combat abilities during flight, such as switching power to weapons when making an attack run, boosting shields while being pursued in a dogfight, or turbo-boosting engines in order to escape capture from a tractor beam.
 
Last edited:
Laira Vereen said:
Door Guns: The Door guns are normally only fired in Type I or II atmospheres as otherwise opening the doors to use them would depressurize the craft or draw power from the other systems to maintain its life support.
Depressurization probably has several other things to consider, to include the world's gravity, ship's altitude, and atmospheric density. I don't think that most of us want to go too deep into this, but please note somewhere that these are additional factors that could play a role in it.



Laira Vereen said:
Length: 24.98 Meters Width: 34.25 Meters Height: 3.35 Meters


Laira Vereen said:
Squadron Count: 12

  • Squadron Count: (Optional. Please provide the amount of fighters this submission would have in a squadron. The average squadron for any starfighter is 12, at lengths averaging 12.5 meters. The bigger the fighter, the smaller your Squadron Count should be. The smaller the fighter, the bigger your Squadron count can be.)
By linear scaling then, the U-wing should have a squadron count of around 4 or 6 (depending on which dimension we use). I would probably go with 6, seeing that most of that width appears to just be wing-span. This allows us to take into account that unlike the average starfighter, this is also carrying 16 passengers.
 
How to the comparative ratings work out given that there would be half as many? Also i figured since Y-Wings are roughly the same size and in squadrons of 12 it wouldn't be an issue.

Also Linear from X-Wing is kinda pointless and arbitrary given that Linearly TIEs should be 20 (7.5) or more and Y-Wings would be roughly 6 as well (23.4 meters each)

[member="Gir Quee"]
 
Laira Vereen said:
How to the comparative ratings work out given that there would be half as many? Also i figured since Y-Wings are roughly the same size and in squadrons of 12 it wouldn't be an issue. Also Linear from X-Wing is kinda pointless and arbitrary given that Linearly TIEs should be 20 (7.5) or more and Y-Wings would be roughly 6 as well (23.4 meters each)
If we want to get really technical about it, it's actually about volume, so it would actually be exponential calculation rather than a linear scaling. However, calculating that is tedious at best, especially when it comes to variable geometry starships like the U-wing.

As far as the Y-wing is concerned, there are several variants that have different lengths, such as the BTL-S3, which has a length of 16 meters. I have little doubt that we could find other variations of starfighters and squadron size in canon and here at Chaos. I also have little doubt that we would find vastly conflicting and disparate ideas of what proper squadron size is based on that because of the wide variety of authors and sources involved.

The most important part though, is general balancing, which is currently dictated by our starship template. It currently is the golden standard to which we look to for the judging process. I agree that it's arbitrary, but it's what we all have to work with.

This ship is significantly larger than the average starfighter per the template. Because it is larger, it can carry 16 people. Most starfighters cannot carry 16 people. There needs to be a commensurate drawback to compensate for this significant passenger carrying capacity. As the template is currently set out, we account for this with squadron size.

Please reduce squadron size.
 
Laira Vereen said:
Squadron Count: Average
Squadron count is optional, and I'm content with the squadron count being left as "N/A".

"Average", however, is not a valid write-in option for this field, because if this heading is filled in, it is supposed to be a numerical amount.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom