L Admin
That is correct. If memory serves, this is the 3rd time it's been brought up since the ban.Lord Ajihad said:Actually, according to [member="Silara Kuhn"] , it has been given a chance, and failed.
Edit: And it hasn't been overturned since.
That is correct. If memory serves, this is the 3rd time it's been brought up since the ban.Lord Ajihad said:Actually, according to [member="Silara Kuhn"] , it has been given a chance, and failed.
You misunderstand. I was questioning the plausibility of it in the first place.Ardeo Sophos said:If one can come up with a plausible, back up reason that their character/species came into being, I don't think it is right to stop them. Opinion is opinion. I don't think there is really any reason other than how you feel, to ban or except the dragon as a species, but I do think it is going far to say that a dragon wouldn't exist in the Star wars universe. Like I said before there are far stranger creatures. Some people don't want a normal class. That is like asking an artist to draw something normal.
I think this calls for a round of applause.Captain Jordan said:Maybe you just need a ban on unbanning Dragons.