Shachath said:
These were just all things I think would have been better served if they had been brought up in the discussion topic where scores of people participated to create what we have on the first page.
What difference does it make where the discussion takes place - I think these are things that need to be addressed before greenlighting the new idea. We're going to need to figure out exactly how it works at some point. Here is as good a place as any to do that.
Shachath said:
These are all questions for the FA. People wanted something simple so this is the bare bones and the OS can build it however they want like they have everything else.
Which is exactly what I'm trying to do.
Lord Sebastian said:
would like you to take a pause for a moment and realize who you are argueing with. This person who seems to "only have 20 posts" is a codex judge and she is one of the best. Also, and I do not say this to be harsh or belittle even though I very much want to, you are making an ass of yourself.
Oh you're not trying to be harsh and belittle me? Cause you know Sephiroth I really couldn't tell, what with you calling me a fool, an ass, and whatever else. But that's okay cause I guess you were just joking lol all in good fun amirite!
Your pet codex judge has also engaged in some questionable practices over at the Republic, but that's irrelevant. Hell, I'm even willing to look past it. I frankly don't care who she is. What I care about is the idea. I'm trying to bring up legitimate concerns with the idea, and you've done nothing but reflexively crap your pants and sling ad hoc insults at me because I wasn't fapping over the new idea enough to meet your approval. So which one of us is the ass?
Lord Sebastian said:
If you don't like this idea then you have clearly stated your case, but the continue nit picking is becoming infuriating. Don't like where the One Sith are going? In the words of redneck American patiriots in my state, "Well then you can get the hell out!" Build your own Sith faction with this vast knowledge and posts you have.
"hey guiz its a poll to see what u all think of this idea!!"
"o yeah... if ur opinion is negative U CAN JUST FKING LEAVE LOL"
I don't think you quite understand the purpose of a discussion thread or a poll there, Malfoy.
Reverance said:
By and large, I support the idea of this illusion of legal notions being carried out in an almost openly illegal way. Elections, yeah, they'll pretty much never be rped. But if they were, it would be like trying to get elected in some corrupted government where competitors are being killed, bought off, or consumed by their competition. Either way, I think it's a nice touch that adds flavor without impacting the texture. Corrupt/Evil/Whathaveyou people are gonna be running things and they likely will not have gotten there on the wings of fairness or justice.
Forgive me if I'm misinterpreting, but you're saying that the officials will be elected, then? Because this is contradicting what Vornskr just said above. I also explained how democratic elections are pretty antithetical to the Sith way, and wouldn't really make sense. If the elections are gonna be rigged in the first place, why even have them at all? It's not like the Sith are operating in secret within another form of government, like the Republic or something. This is OS territory and the Sith are completely free to form their own systems of government and appoint their own rulers without the pretense of democracy.
That's not to say subterfuge wouldn't exist within the power struggles between Sith and other officials. But my point is that the Sith are not trying to take over the Republic from within. We already have our own territory and government, so why the need for democratic elections? Especially if they're not going to be RPed. It's an unnecessary stepping stone for the Sith's ultimate purpose, which is only the strong can will themselves into power.
Reverance said:
As for Wrath and Eye and Hands and Voices and Shadow? We have a resource page that more or less details it.
Forgive me but I can't for the life of me find the resource page that describes exactly what they do.
Reverance said:
I wont go into detail except to say that in the purpose of the politics, the eye and wrath would be similar because they are similar in the idea of being directly attached to the Dark Lord. When one says something, the other would say the same thing, with the idea that they are saying what the Dark Lord would say. Military leaders would have power but we haven't defined that. Why? Well because when attempts were made to do so, the concept was constructively criticized as being too complicated. So that's something we pocketed for the future development that could be established IC. Pretty much everything else you have asked is something that I fully think could be developed IC. What power does the Wrath and Eye have? Well it's still the OS, we can figure that one out without too much head scratching. The Speaker of the Will would likely be part of another council that convenes indirectly with the dark lord.
The reason I bring it up is because of this: we need to figure out how to implement a system that meets the following goals:
1) works with the hierarchy we already have, or if necessary, gets rid of a few positions, and
2) provides a coherent hierarchy for NFU characters.
We have all these high-ranking Sith positions, and I think it's important we discuss how everything is going to fit together. My questions are pretty basic, really. Is the Speaker of the Will simply a custodian of the so-called "senate" of Wills, or does he actually wield considerable power like a Grand Moff? Same with the Wills. Are they like Moffs, and if so, what type of Moffs are we basing them off of? Sith Empire era? Galactic Empire era? Krayt's Empire era? Do they have power that is greater, lesser than, or equal to other NFU military positions like Admiral, General, etc?
In other words, who answers to whom?
The more I think about this question the more I realize that things are going to get a little complicated. Like I said, we need to make this work with what we already have. And right now, I'm not sure what we have because nobody can give me a straight answer on what all these positions are.
Don't you think that these are pretty important questions that should be answered before we vote yes on a game-changing system like this? The reason why I bring this up is simple. I'm not going to sign off on an idea without knowing what the potential consequences of the idea are. Right now, the idea has potential, but it's incredibly vague. The reason why I voted "no" was because I think it's wise and in our best interest to sort this stuff out now rather than later. It's going to need to be sorted sometime.
Reverance said:
We aren't etching these ideas in stone, guys. We are here to have open discourse and what motivates that more than a poll? But we can do that politely and with respect. Everyone has ideas here and they are worth hearing, and disagreeing doesn't make one party smarter or wiser than the other. So keep that in mind: We write Sith characters but that doesn't make us Sith.
Disagreeing is part of open discourse.