Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Approved Starship Skism-Class ESD/3

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mauda

Well-Known Member
ht0Qxu6.png

OOC INFO

Intent - To provide The Emergence Navy with a Star-Destroyer

Image Source: Pinterest

PRODUCTION INFO

Manufacturer - Exapo Shipyard / EEC

Affiliation - The Emergence Empire

Model - Skism-Class ESD/3

Production - Minor

Materials: Frasium, Ultrachrome, Transparisteel, Alusteel, Microcameras

Outermost Layers - Frasium, Ultrachrome
Deeper Layers - Alusteel Alloy

Technical Specifications

Classification - Star Destroyer

Length - 1,975m

Width - 1,000m

Height - 300m

Armament - High:

Defenses - High:

  • Spherical Deflector Shield Generators - 2
  • Thick Alusteel Hull Armour
  • Ultrachrome Plate
  • Frasium Coat



Maneuverability - Low

Engines - 3 MT-DP

Speed - Low

Hangar Size - 12 Squadrons

Hangar Allocation:

Standard Features



HSI / DER / EPR / AS / LFI

Hyperspace Tracking

Deep-Range Sensors/Scanners

Escape Pods

Holding Cells

Retractable Bridge Cover

Backup Hyperdrive

Belly-Hangar

Belly Docking Bay

Electronic Redundancy

Internal Camera Network

Internal Anti-Intruder Ceiling Turret Network

One-Way Hangar Shield (Ships can exit, cannot enter)

Crew Decks / Infantry Decks

Auxilliary A.I (Functional in absence of Admiral or capable Bridge Officer)

Advanced Features

Planetary Scanner

Strengths

Shielded - High Power Output : Turboplasma Population ratio allows the ESD/3 the energy to afford shields.

Devastator - Armed to the Teeth with some of the most advanced weaponry; Turboplasma Turrets and Batteries, Antimatter Ship-Ship Nuclear Missiles, Heavy Ion Cannons etc. The Skism-Class Destroyers tend to form the brunt of the frontline

Full Arc - Turboplasma Turrets and Medium Ion Cannons have been placed forward, back, left, right, up, down, sideways, turn around.. Firepower encompasses every arc. Except the underside.

Weaknesses

Critical Hit - The STA-H04 Batteries each have a dedicated Antimatter Reactor from which they draw their ammo. If these reactors are destroyed, the fuel within them can potentially escape deeper into the Host-Hull, reacting with regular matter and causing serious damage.

Slow - It is... Slow. Doesn't move awfully fast

Fuel Efficiency - Massive engines with a thrust output far above that of the average Ion engine. But these engines aren't nearly as fuel efficient. Get into a chase with an Emergence Star Destroyer and you can easily expect it to run out of juice well before you do.

Description

Forming the brunt of the Emergence's Naval Power, the Skism-Class ESD/3 is armed up down and sideways. Not to mention its got a Fire-Arc that can be described like that. Its biggest killer are the 40 Heavy Batteries of STA-H04 Turboplasma's. Located in Twenties each far side of the Bridge.

The rest of the hull is dotted with STA-01 Turboplasma Turrets and Medium Ion Cannons. Down the centre line is where the launch tubes for 32 Proton Torpedoes are found. Further back, toward the bridge are similar launch tubes, however these fire Guided Hreinsa Missiles. Antimatter Nuclear bombs that pack a 50kt punch after embedding themselves in a ship's hull.

Filled with so much Armour, the three MT-DP Engines that propel it can only bring it to a half-decent speed, adequate for the average battlefield but barely as fast as any other Star Destroyer.

Summary of Changes
  • Changed image to match E aesthetic
 
Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening, [member="Orex Mauda"]. First and foremost, thank you for taking the time to use the factory. I will be reviewing your sub and changes made to it and I hope this will be quick and painless. If at all, my wording does not make sense to you, please do not hesitate to ask me to reword or clarify my statement(s)...

Overall I see nothing wrong, as you only edited the image used for the portrayal of the ship's design. However, as menial as it may sound, please be sure to include a "summary of changes" in the submission itself to detail any changes made to the submission. I appreciate you listing it in the additional post, but please be sure to include that information in the submission itself as well.

Please tag me when you've done this and we can push this for secondary approval.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom