Sentinel E-Class Pocket Carrier

[Onrai]

Image unknown, from Imageshack.us

Intent: To create a tech submission to update the Sentinel-class Corvettes acquired from the Sith Empire by Subach-Innes for
Development Thread: N/A
Manufacturer: Seinar Fleet Systems(originally), Subach-Innes(refit)
Model: Sentinel E-Class Pocket Carrier
Affiliation: Independent
Modularity: Yes(fighter complement)
Production: Mass-Produced
Material: Durasteel(frame), Duranium(hull)
Description: Sentinel corvettes purchased from the Empire priot to its collapse by Subach-Innes were stripped to their frames and plated with cast duranium. Their purchase was intended to provide a close-in weapon system for use by smaller governments, in concert with a soon to be developed kamikaze drone similar to the TIE Detonator, manufactured by Seinar and thus not able to be produced by Subach. Superior automation and the usual fixings result in a ship roughly capable of doing the same as its Imperial version.

Classification: Support Corvette
Role: Pocket Carrier
Height: 75m
Width: 100m
Length: 200m
Power Core Generator/Reactor: Solar Ionization Reactor
Hyperdrive Rating: Class 2
Minimum Crew: 10
Optimal Crew: 50
Armaments:

• 4 turbolasers
• 5 quad lasers

Hangar:

• 24 fighters or bombers
• 2 gunships
• 4 dropships

Non-Combative Attachments:

• Sensors
• Shields

Passenger Capacity: 50
Cargo Capacity: 250 metric tons
Consumables: 1.5 years
Sublight Speed and Maneuverability: Class 5

 

[Domino]

Wait, is this produced by Seinar or are you talking about the drone?
And no on the Duranium, that stuff is very hard to form and to expensive to coat mass-produced Corvettes in.
Classification is 'Support Corvette' so people know what kind of ship this is. Roll would be pocket carrier/escort as that's its usage.
Description of the ship itself, IE capabilities, weaknesses, quirks, needs to be expanded upon because as it is this is just about how you got it and a drone that doesn't exist yet.
Please link the other versions for comparison.
And this may seem like nit-picking but as lightly armed as it is, there's no way this should be a close-in weapons system.
@[member="Circe Savan"]

 

[Onrai]

I'm referring to the fact that the TIE Detonator, the kamikaze drone used as a weapon in such carrier ships as these and Subjugators, is no longer acquirable. Not with the dissolution of the Empire and Seinar's future in doubt. Thus, I'd need to make my own drone in order for it to be used by carriers such as this.
Considering the smoothly curved shape of the corvette, I don't exactly see why duranium cast in the proper shape couldn't be fitted. They do it with plenty of other vehicles, and I haven't seen anyone with an issue over previous duranium-framed or duranium-hulled warships. It's not like duranium canonically is superior to durasteel.
Alright, changed to "Support Corvette."
Weaknesses... It's a corvette-sized carrier. Do I need to go into intricate detail about how practically every warship could devour it in a fight, even balanced or heavy corvettes, and how it still has only average anti-fighter armament for its size?
Twould be easy to look it up on the Sith Empire armory manifest, but here you go. http://starwarsrp.net/topic/9278-sentinel-class-corvette/
Never intended for it to be a CIWS.
@[member="Domino"]

 

[Domino]

Circe, I said your description needs to be lengthened and about the ship and then gave you some example topics, hence the 'IE'.

Their purchase was intended to provide a close-in weapon system for use by smaller governments

You said it was a ciws in your own description.
Thank you, your other arguments have been noted.

Many of your 'secondary stats' have been improved as well with no explanation, a 50% increase in consumables, more passengers/cargo space, and a drop in crew count for example along with your short description that lacks any real substance. Add in that you chose to argue everything I pointed out and complied in a very back-handed manner only in providing the link. I will have to deny this. If you feel this was unfair or too harsh, there's always the second chance thread.
@[member="Circe Savan"]

TL/DR