For the record, this is mostly speculation based on observation, at least regards to motive and the military utility. Death Watch are icky, so I can't say what they've actually been planning.
Jor Kvall said:
Mandalorians have always been a bit of a wild card, sure, but that doesn't change that our enemies have always been Jedi. We've had thousands of years of warfare with Jedi that ended with them nuking our homeworld. That is not easily forgotten for any true Mandalorian. Then when Mandalore was under the control of its pro-Republic faction, it resulted in our total cultural and moral deterioration and actual starvation of the populace. The Death Watch, the group which our faction is literally based off of, owes its entire existence to opposing these types.
There are roughly as many definitions as to what makes a "true Mandalorian" as there are stars to be conquered. Going back to canon, both Legends and current, Mandalorians and Jedi have fought against each other, and they've fought with each other, as the situation required. Boba Freaking Fett launched a joint raid on the Roche asteroid system with Luke Skywalker. They didn't like each other, and they didn't part on good terms, but that's about as Mando and Jedi as you can get.
You can talk about what a "true Mandalorian" might think, but the single overriding trait common to all Mandalorians that has united them across the eras is pragmatism. Dogma is fine and all, but it doesn't put food on the table.
Jor Kvall said:
This doesn't serve our best interests. If attrition is the goal, then why not simply let the two rivals duke it out themselves? If expansion is the goal, what is the point of expending valuable resources and lives in a foreign conflict that has nothing to do with us when we could be building our own territories instead, while everyone else is preoccupied? Or, another wild idea - why not ally and trade with the foreing powers ideologically closest to us? (Hint: not the ones who destroyed our planets in the past).
Strategy and tactics are two entirely different things. Staying out of a fight that doesn't involve you might be a smart tactic, but in the end, it's not always good strategy. Long term, it's very much in the best interest of the Mandalorians to do wear down their main rivals. Doing so requires a relatively small investment on the Mando end. You can wreak untold havoc on an opponent whose back is turned, without having to expend more than a token amount of your own resources. Similarly, a relatively small group of fighters in just the right spot can easily blunt an attack and force the targets to expend far more energy than they otherwise would to complete their objective. Again, Mandalorian expenditure is minimal, but the return on the investment is not.
Jor Kvall said:
If the GA are waning and the FO is waxing, why not ally with the stronger power? If the outcome is so sure, wouldn't it be better to have the victors in our debt, rather than the losers?
What's more useful in the long run: an ally who owes their very existence to Mandalore, or a strong rival who could challenge for supremacy? I never said that the GA would lose, simply that they would get hammered. It's going to happen. There's too much firepower headed their way for them not to take considerable losses. That's not the same thing as taking a loss, however. Historically, a small, well trained and disciplined force can serve as a backstop against a much larger one. The GA will still have to hold their own, but with a little help in the right spot, their plight goes from unsurvivable to winnable.
Also consider that the longer the GA exists, the more attention the Imperial factions will have to focus in their direction. Those factions will have to be dealt with at some point, and if they can be forced to fight a multifront war, so much the better. Strategically speaking, that works out far better for Mandalore in the long run than a swift elimination of the GA.
[member="Jor Kvall"]