[member="Darth Venefica"]
Whilst I can understand where you're coming from with the creation of a new minor faction, and the feeling of accomplishment that will come to new ones as they help it grow, I do notice some ideas of yours that seem a bit iffy.
First things first, I'm fairly certain that the OS as it has been used recently has been a fairly loose collection of Sith going out and gallivanting among the stars. Even IC, I don't see a very authoritarian system in terms of restrictions for Sith PC's. You seem to highlight a new system wherein individualism is promoted, but I believe we've already implemented that.
Next, you encourage a series of checks and balances, but implementing a set of rules rather discourages the individualism you're aiming for, doesn't it? I agree that a council of some manner does seem to be a decent idea, and allows for various people to feel more attached to the group, and allows their ideas to be better received as a whole, but if they aren't at all superior to their colleagues, what is the point?
The idea of challenging those in power to take their seats is very Sith-y, but from an OOC standpoint it might take away from the unity of the group, and instead devolve into a brawl for a seat that apparently does nothing but advise.
Which brings me to my next issue. You mention that we ought to bring in an IC leader such as an Emperor. Whilst the idea is fine, and can be useful for directing the attention of the group forward, it can also lead to lots of infighting. While I understand that infighting leads to RP, it can quickly become overwhelming, and lead to a cycle of just people fighting over the position of being leader. Also, if we have a PC leader it is unlikely they will actually heed the advice of any of the Dark Council, and that will effectively render them useless.
All in all I believe that there are many good ideas here, but that they require a bit of work before we use them, or at the very least some serious consideration from the group as a whole.