Division-Class "Dragonfly" Starfighter

[Karsh Lithern]

TOP VIEW:

BOTTOM VIEW:

Img src: https://www.facebook.com/RobertsSpaceIndustries

INTENT: To create an extremely versatile, fast, and heavily armed personal starfighter.

DEVELOPMENT THREAD: N/A (It's in the works)

MANUFACTURER: Tenloss Corporation

MODEL: Division-Class Starfighter

AFFILIATION: Neutral

MODULARITY: Small cargo and armaments upgrades available

PRODUCTION: Mass produced

MATERIALS: Durasteel, glasteel

DESCRIPTION: The Division-Class Starfighter has top of the line maneuverability capabilities, able to angle itself in extreme positions, able to out do almost every fighter out there. For this it adopted the nickname dragonfly. It is fortified with powerful, compact weapons, able to put out extreme fire power on a small platform. The ship has very light armor and constantly has to go for refueling and reloading due to its compact design.

CLASSIFICATION: Starfighter

ROLE: Deploy-able assault ship

HEIGHT: 3.5 Meters

WIDTH: 8 Meters

LENGTH: 15 Meters

POWER CORE: Fuel cells

HYPERDRIVE RATING: N/A (made for deployed in-space combat missions)

MINIMUM CREW: 1

OPTIMAL CREW: 1

ARMAMENTS:
2 proton torpedoes (4 ammo each)
1 High fire rate, rotating blaster cannon
2 Medium blaster cannons

NON-COMBATIVE ATTACHMENTS:
10 small propulsion engines (top and bottom on the ends of either wing, 4 on the tip (seen in the picture), top behind the cockpit, and underneath the cockpit) to allow for extreme maneuverability.

CARGO CAPACITY: .25 of a metric ton (small compartment behind the seat)

CONSUMABLES: 3 days

SUBLIGHT SPEED AND MANEUVERABILITY: 1

 

[Ayden Cater]

@[member="Karsh Lithern"]

10 engines seems very excessive. The X-wing is probably the most engine heavy fighter in the galaxy and it only had four.

 

[Karsh Lithern]

@[member="Ayden Cater"]

Well their not entirely engines. More of stabilizers, not for speed but for maneuverability. They only help the ship to "acrobatics" per se.

 

[Domino]

*Taking over with Ayden's permission*

If you mean maneuvering thrusters then please label them as such.

.25 metric tones is way more than any starfighter has for cargo space. Most have cargo spaces that can be measures in the low tens of kilograms. Remember, space is at a premium in starfighters and bombers.

You're also over the weapon limit, either remove the rotating blaster or the other two for this to be acceptable as an interceptor. In addition in the description you mention that it requires constant refueling but it has consumables for three days, meaning everything a ship and its crew needs to operate for that time, fuel, air, water, food, ect... Emergency rations not included.
@[member="Karsh Lithern"]

 

[Ayden Cater]

@[member="Karsh Lithern"]

Domino needs a response from this.