Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Approved Starship SOVFRIG-Series Partisan-class Frigate Carrier

Status
Not open for further replies.
YpV6Uat.png
[out of character information]
  • INTENT: TO CREATE A CLOSE SUPPORT LINE OF FRIGATES FOR THE SOVEREIGNTY'S NAVY.
  • IMAGE SOURCE: STAR CITIZEN : HERE
  • CANON LINK: N/A
  • RESTRICTED MISSIONS: N/A
  • PRIMARY SOURCE: N/A
[production information]
[technical specifications]
  • CLASSIFICATION: FRIGATE CARRIER
  • LENGTH: 500M
  • WIDTH: 190M
  • HEIGHT: 80M
  • ARMAMENT: VERY LOW
    ​2 HEAVY TURBOLASERS
  • 2 LIGHT TURBOLASERS
  • 1 HEAVY ION CANNON
  • 1 SINGULAR PROTON TORPEDO LAUNCHER
    8 TORPEDOES

[*]1 HEAVY TRACTOR BEAM

[*]DEFENSES: HIGH
[*]HANGAR: 2 SQUADRONS
  • ​24 STARFIGHTERS
  • 2 SHUTTLES
  • 12 MILITARY SPEEDERS -OR- 4 LIGHT WALKERS

[*]MANEUVERABILITY RATING: LOW
[*]SPEED RATING: AVERAGE
[*]HYPERDRIVE CLASS: 1
[standard features]
  • WARSHIP ION DRIVES
  • WARSHIP HAZARD AND DAMAGE CONTROL SYSTEMS
  • WARSHIP LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS
  • WARSHIP NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEMS
  • WARSHIP SENSORS AND TARGETING SYSTEMS
  • WARSHIP COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
  • WARSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEMS
  • WARSHIP ESCAPE PODS
  • HOLONET TRANSCEIVER AND ENCRYPTION/DECRYPTION NETWORKS

[advanced systems]
  • N/A

[strengths]
  • JACK OF ALL TRADES: A WELL-AROUND BUILT FRIGATE CARRIER TO SERVE MAINLY AS A CLOSE SUPPORT LINE TO THE MAIN BATTLE LINE BUT ALSO CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING PICKET LINE EFFORTS.
[weaknesses]
  • MASTER OF NONE: THE CARRIER'S DIVERSE ARRAY OF FUNCTIONS MAKE IT INCAPABLE OF SPECIALIZING IN A CERTAIN ROLE WITH EFFICIENCY. WHILE AIMING TO MAINTAIN FLEXIBILITY ON THE LINE OF BATTLE, IT CANNOT FIND ITS UNIQUE NICHE WITHIN IT AND STRUGGLES TO COMPETE WITH THOSE SPECIALIZED IN THEIR PARTICULAR ROLES.
[description]

The Partisan-class Frigate Carrier was initially not created with the purpose of supporting battle lines on equal footed naval engagements. The idea behind the creation of the Partisan was to develop a fast enough ship capable of pursuing pirates and overwhelming them with the number of starfighter squadrons it deployed. It was made to be efficient in the goal of the Sovereignty to consolidate their spread out thin naval forces across its constantly harassed by pirates star systems in Wild Space. The frigate carrier certainly covered the gap due to its multifunctional roles and flexibility but as the naval forces of the Sovereignty slowly began progressing into the next level - that of an organized, modern, doctrine-led Navy - the partisan served an odd purpose as a close support ship in the line of battle.

While the Sovereignty's Navy slowly progressed from the steps of a rag-tag naval force to which the Partisan excelled in, this frigate carrier would find its purpose as a jack of all trades ship in the beginnings of the formation of the Navy. Its future is obviously that of replacement and its refocus once again to its roots - protection of piracy but until then the Partisan-class Frigate Carrier will serve as well as possible the newly born nation in the wild, wild Wild Space.



Mod Request 24.4.2018
OG Sections:
New Sections:
 

Travis Caalgen

Guest
T
Aeric Saigo said:
HANGAR: 3 SQUADRONS
Shuttles and military ground vehicles do not count against squadron count, therefore you would only have two (2) squadrons. In any case, two would still be equivalent to 'Very High', therefore I request that you add three weaknesses, lower three ratings, or a mixture of the two (i.e. lower one rating, add two genuine weaknesses.)
 
[member="Travis Caalgen"]

I've only put Maneuvrability down as Low and fixed the squadron mistake but otherwise this ship is an absolute copy, par for its defence rating, of the cookie cutter frigate carrier canon ship that's been given here so I am reluctant to make any more changes.

It refers to this ship.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom