Unreviewed R.A.C.E.R. (Rectification And Cross Examination Routine)

[Bido Roz’lyn]

are you sure you wish to initiate self destruct sequencing? Y/N

OUT OF CHARACTER INFORMATION

• Intent:
  • Create a software that acts as a viable counter to corruption or sabotage.
• Image Source: n/a
• Canon Link: n/a
• Permissions: n/a
• Primary Source: n/a

PRODUCTION INFORMATION

• Manufacturer: Dornean Braha'ket Fleetworks Conglomerate
• Affiliation: anyone
• Market Status: Open-Market
• Model:
  • Full Name: Rectification And Cross Examination Routine.
  • Acronym: R.A.C.E.R.
• Modularity: no
• Production: Mass-Produced
• Material:
  • Trinary code
  • Binary code

SPECIAL FEATURES

• This software provides a routine for constant cross-system internal self auditing to detect any inconsistencies that are often associated with things like:
  • Mechu Duru Corruption
  • Malware infection
  • Aberrant Heuristic Behaviour Deviations
  • Slicer intrusions
  • Physical sabotage
• Nominal specifications for all subsystems within a machine are periodically recorded and stored within each system. The software uses those systems to constantly run diagnostics on each other to make sure nothing is being altered outside of accepted parameters.
• Once an unacceptable deviation is identified within a subsystem, the software accesses the specifications stored within all adjacent subsystems to restore the corrupted subsystem to the previously acceptable settings/configurations.
• In systems operated by organics, the user interface allows for normal configurations and settings to be changed within the system. If the R.A.C.E.R. software detects non-benign changes to settings, configurations, or diagnostics, the software will often lock down the subsystem and then prompt the user to confirm whether or not the identified alterations are consensual.
• Updates are regularly available on the holonet. This way, the software can remain relevant and keep pace with modernizing military technologies.
• The user interface is highly intuitive and adaptable. This is done so that the software can be easily downloaded and used quickly in combat. The UI has settings that can be quickly adjusted for different race physiologies or computer operating systems.

STRENGTHS

• Rapid Intrusion Detection - this software constantly instructs all subsystems within a machine to cross audit each other on a frequent and routine basis. This often catches intrusions or errors before they can cause serious problems.
• Counter Corruption and Correction - Since all subsystems retain a nominal template of what each other system is supposed to look like, they can use that data to easily restore a corrupted component to previous iterations.

WEAKNESSES

• Last Line of Defence - While this software can often detect and correct corruption fairly quickly, it is not used to prevent initial intrusions. A third party Threat prevention suite is still recommended.
• Temporary Setback - For most intrusions or corruptions, this software can rectify things almost instantly. However, some attacks can be so powerful or thorough that it takes a bit longer to restore them to safe parameters. For these situations, if there is an organic user involved, the corrupted systems will get locked down, and the user will receive a prompt requesting permission to run a diagnostic. The diagnostic will have the corrupted system under lockdown for a brief period of time, depending on the level of infection.

DESCRIPTION
During the incident on Mon Calamari, Lieutenant Bido Roz’lyn had noticed that her port side missiles had become faulty, so she locked them down for a diagnostic routine. Once the battle had ended, she went through her ship's system logs on the back-end and discovered that her missiles had been mysteriously tampered with. What was remarkable, however, was that the missiles had autonomously used their own private shared network to diagnose the problem and prompted the user for validation. While impressive, it also highlighted the viability of using sub-system peer auditing systems to prevent future corrupting intrusions.

Upon taking this information to the engineers at Braha'ket, they proceeded to dissect the fundamental root of this unexpected solution. What they discovered began to inform the development of their next software project:

They began to take notice of how modern technology was becoming increasingly dependent on subsystem integration. Sensor packages could talk to targeting suites. Power management communicated with shield generators. Droid cognition cores interacted with locomotion hardware, communication arrays, and environmental processors. The more interconnected a system would become, the more vulnerable it becomes to intrusion, corruption, spoofing, sabotage, or outright malicious manipulation. In essence, complex machines were becoming more and more analogous to a culture of subsystems working together.

In an effort to leverage this dynamic for defensive purposes, R.A.C.E.R. was developed around a relatively straightforward premise: If one subsystem can be fooled, several subsystems comparing notes become significantly harder to deceive.

The Rectification And Cross Examination Routine is a defensive software architecture designed to continuously force internal systems to validate one another through active interrogation, telemetry comparison, checksum verification, behavioural heuristics, and challenge-response authentication routines. Rather than relying on a singular defensive firewall approach, R.A.C.E.R. distributes verification responsibilities across the entire host platform itself. The software manages these various cross-system verification functions with a graceful efficiency:

• A targeting package reporting target lock may be challenged by sensor telemetry.
• A shield controller reporting nominal function may be cross-examined against actual power draw.
• A droid personality matrix exhibiting irregular behavior may be compared against expected heuristic baselines.
• A vehicle's navigation system may be validated against archived astrogation calculations, inertial drift readings, and independent sensor positioning.
• and so-on…

Where discrepancies are detected, the protocol initiates automated correction routines intended to isolate, refresh, reconcile, or temporarily suppress compromised software functions before broader corruption can propagate.

This makes R.A.C.E.R. particularly effective against conventional slicing attempts, malware implantation, telemetry spoofing, subsystem tampering, false command injection, certain forms of electronic warfare contamination, and even technologically mediated corruption attempts such as Mechu-Deru manipulation.

However, R.A.C.E.R. is not a preventative shield. It does not stop hostile intrusion from occurring. Instead, it detects compromise rapidly and aggressively attempts correction.

This distinction is important.

A particularly powerful intrusion may still briefly disrupt system performance before rectification occurs. Often, a prompt is sent to the user to determine if corrective measures should be initiated. During these correction windows, affected systems may experience momentary delays, degraded responsiveness, reduced combat efficacy, or temporary interruptions in functionality.

R.A.C.E.R. does not make a system untouchable, but it does make it significantly harder to keep compromised. This is why the software is often paired with a third party threat prevention system, making itself as the last line of defence against system attacks while threat prevention is tasked to block the initial intrusions.