Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Approved Tech Isotope5 Energy Shield

Status
Not open for further replies.
OUT OF CHARACTER INFORMATION

  • Intent: Create a Localized Energy shield for Locations owned by The Sith Empire
  • Image Source: (Please link to where you found the image, or to the original artist if possible. TinEye or Google Image Search can help.)
  • Canon Link: (Please link the canon link if applicable canon item.)
  • Primary Source: (Please link and cite the sources which you are modifying for your use in your submission.)
PRODUCTION INFORMATION
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
  • Classification: Shield
  • Size: Very Large
  • Weight: Extreme
SPECIAL FEATURES
  • Remote Activation System
  • Military Grade Hardware
Strengths:
  • Isotope5 makes for a shield strong enough to withstand most of the heavier artillery
  • Radius of the shield is large enough to cover a city
Weaknesses:
  • Highly unstable reactor
Over all this shield is designed to create a highly fortified defense for places important to The Sith Empire. This shield will be used in places such as capital cities, landmarks or military bases. The Remote activation system is done through several military grade encryptions. These are handled only by Darth Morgoth and and other high ranking members of the Sith Empire.
 

Netherworld

Well-Known Member
[member="Darth Morgoth"]

All fields of the template must be filled out. If there's nothing for you to enter, simply put down N/A or similar.



Darth Morgoth said:
Manufacturer: The Sith Empire
Please provide a link to the Major Faction in question.



Darth Morgoth said:
Production: Limited
Excepting T6 specialties, RM submissions cannot exceed a production of Semi-unique. Please make the appropriate edits.



Darth Morgoth said:
Isotope5 makes for a rather strong shield
Could you detail this a bit more? 'Very strong' is a bit vague at the moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom