Star Wars Roleplay: Chaos

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Approved Starship Interdictor II class Carrier

Status
Not open for further replies.
PguuFPM.jpg

OUT OF CHARACTER INFORMATION
RoWeyJt.png

Intent: The creation of a support carrier for use by the Order of the Seven Flames

Image Source: Interdictor-class Cruiser - [HERE]

Canon Link: N/a
Restricted Missions: N/a
Primary Source: N/a
PRODUCTION INFORMATION
RoWeyJt.png


Manufacturer:
  • Order of the Seven Flames
Model:
  • Interdictor II
Affiliation:
  • Order of the Seven Flames
Production:
  • Minor
Material:
  • Starship Components
  • Durasteel

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
RoWeyJt.png


Classification:
  • Cruiser
  • Carrier
Length:
  • 600 meters
Width:
  • 215 meters
Height:
  • 159 meters
Armament:
  • Low​
    Point Defense Light Laser Batteries (14)
  • Quad Laser Cannons (6)

Defenses:
  • Average
    ​Military Grade Deflector Shields
  • Military Grade Ray Shields
  • Reinforced Durasteel Hull Plating

Hangar:
  • Extreme
    6 Squadrons
  • 8 Shuttles

Maneuverability Rating:
  • Low
Speed Rating:
  • Low
Hyperdrive Class:
  • Average
    ​Class 2


STANDARD FEATURES
RoWeyJt.png


Military Grade Sensor Array
Military Grade Communications Array
Main Thrusters (3)
Auxiliary Thrusters (4)
NaviComputer
Escape Pods
Tractorbeam Batteries (4)


ADVANCED FEATURES
RoWeyJt.png

Gravity Well Projectors (2)


STRENGTHS
RoWeyJt.png

Gravity Well Projectors
Much like the Interdictor II class Cruiser - the Carrier Variant still holds two Gravity Well Projectors - these projectors are utilized to drag vessels out of hyperspace through the production of mass shadows. Likewise they can be used to prevent vessels from escaping into hyperspace and cut off their avenue of retreat.
Starfighter Squadrons
The Interdictor II class Carrier is a vessel more dedicated towards the deployment of starfighters - which is to this end this vessels greatest strength. It is capable of deploying multiple starfighter squadrons into the fray to assist in protecting itself as well as vessels it is working alongside of from enemy starfighters and smaller craft.

WEAKNESSES
RoWeyJt.png

Dorsal and Ventral Structure
Much like its sister design of the Interdictor II class Cruiser - the Carrier variant still maintains the Dorsal and Ventral super structures that split this vessel in half. If sufficient firepower were levied against these areas, it could have the potential to either cripple or outright destroy the vessel.
Limited Armament
The Interdictor II class Carrier is more focused on its capabilities of carrying starfighters than on its capability of its own armaments. Thus due to its limited amount of weaponry, the Carrier variant is heavily dependent upon its starfighter squadrons and escort vessels for added protection.

DESCRIPTION
RoWeyJt.png

The Interdictor II class Carrier is a design that somewhat deviates from the original cruiser design of the Interdictor class - being that much of its armaments and two of the gravity well projectors have been removed in favor of an expansion of its hangers to facility additional carrying capacity of starfighters and shuttles. This also means that in terms of cargo capacity and passengers - it is lacking in comparison to its sister design - the Interdictor II class Cruiser.
While it maintains some systems of the Interdictor II class Cruiser - such as two gravity well projectors - it has its own downsides to its design. The primary being the downside shared by the Interdictor line - the large dorsal and ventral structures that split the vessel into two sections; however, unlike the Interdictor II class Cruiser - the Interdictor II class Carrier is more capable of dealing with smaller vessels that may utilize this weakness due to its expanded starfighter compliment.
For the most part this vessel is intended to be seen working alongside the Cruiser variant of the Interdictor series in service of the Order of the Seven Flames.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
RoWeyJt.png


Crew
5,224
Passengers
1,600
Cargo Capacity
9,000 Metric Tons
Consumables
2.5 Years

 
The Whispering Tyrant said:
Hangar: High 48 Starfighters 6 Shuttles
If you'll list the carried craft by number of squadrons per the template please. At this size, it's closest to the 500 meter example, meaning that it'd have three squadrons. However, this is a little bit underpowered right now, so you could increase the number of squadrons here if you'd like by increasing its rating.



The Whispering Tyrant said:
STRENGTHS Gravity Well Projectors Starfighter Squadrons WEAKNESSES Dorsal and Ventral Structure Limited Armament
If you'll expand upon this areas please, and give us a little explanation or description behind each one of these.


Overall, this is a little bit underpowered. You can boost up two ratings if you'd like.
 
Edited
  • Gravity Well Projectors - Expanded Description
  • Starfighter Squadrons - Expanded Description
  • Dorsal and Ventral Structure - Expanded Description
  • Limited Armament - Expanded Description
  • Hanger - raised from High to Very High - Did not up any other ratings to maintain balance

[member="Gir Quee"]
 
[member="The Whispering Tyrant"], we're looking pretty close to approval. Because this is closer to the 500 meter mark rather than the 750 meter, I've been using the 500 meter size for estimating hangar. This is from the Cruiser template in the Starship Template post:
Hangar: (Please provide the amount of fighters this submission can hold in it's hangar by count of Squadrons, which hold 12 average Starfighters. The higher your squadron count, the lower your Armament and number of advanced systems should be. )
  • 500 Meters: [None: - | Very Low: 0 | Low: 1 | Average: 2 | Moderate: - | High: 3 | Very High: 5 | Extreme: 6]

"Very High" would get this 5 squadrons rather than 6. However, there is enough room in the ship's current ratings to increase the rating to "extreme" and get all six squadrons. If you'll change the rating to "extreme", we should be all set.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom