CA Horizon

[Ben Carlin]

Image Source: http://www.scifi-meshes.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-2212-p-12.html]Here
Affiliation: Chiss Expansionary Defense Force, Grand Admiral Voss Thrawn
Manufacturer: Chiss Ascendancy
Model: N/A
Modularity: No
Production: Unique
Material: Durasteel hull
Classification: Destroyer
Length: 900m
Height: 290m
Width: 570m
Armament:
Rating 16
600 Turbolasers
10 Heavy Launchers
25 Quad lasers
Defenses:16
Hangar: 4 Squadrons
Special Features: Forward Sheilding able to withstand 10-12 hits from cannons found on larger vessals, Durasteel Amor plating
Maneuverability Rating: 18
Speed Rating: 16
Hyperdrive Class: 1
Strengths:
++ Shielding
++ Armor Plating
Weaknesses:
-- Slow Turn rate
-- Weak on bottom and Rear
-- Unrepaired sections
Description: A Destroyer built by the Chiss Ascendancy as a head vessal to return the Chiss home. Currently in command by Grand Admieal Voss Thrawn. She was built by the Chiss as a main vessal to protect the return fleet. On the route back they faced off against a unknown force, using it's heavy guns and firepower defended the rest of the fleet by covering them with it's frontal sheilds and broadsiding it to take the full attack of the group holding the line. As the Destroyer took the brunt some of the frigates and the attack ships used the cover of the Horion to take out the oposing forces. During the engagments on the way back they ran out of supplies to repair the damage from the conflicts and have weak points on the broadsides of the ship.
Intent: To Provide a Flagship for the Chiss Expansionary Defense Force
Who Can Use This: Grand Admiral of the Chiss Expansionary Defesne Force
Primary Source: N/A

 

[Jorus Merrill]

RESEARCH REVIEW
-----
Star Wars Canon:
Pending initial review
------
Starwars Chaos:
Pending initial review
------
WITHOUT DEV THREADS
Pending initial review
------
WITH DEV THREADS
Pending Initial review
------
SUGGESTIONS
Pending Inital review

 

[Jorus Merrill]

[member="Voss Thrawn"]

1000m+ ships require a dev thread, and as this is a Star Destroyer, that's a thing. Ten posts from Gryffindor.

Slow turn rate should definitely be reflected as a maneuverability stats penalty.

(Other Galaxy)

Let's not talk a ton about the other-galaxy thing, OK? never know how you're going to want to adjust that later.

You've trimmed the guns some, but this is still a lotta guns for a minimum-length Star Destroyer, and the armament rating would shift accordingly. If you have trouble balancing all that, we can talk that through.

Also, plz to flesh out your description a bit.

 

[Ben Carlin]

[member="Jorus Merrill"]

Better?

 

[Ben Carlin]

[member="Jorus Merrill"]

Actually do you mind hiding this thread. I have no use for it at the current moment.

 

[Jorus Merrill]

Archived on submitter's request.

 

[Jorus Merrill]

<p>Moved to Archives - PM [member="Spencer Varanin"] for removal / if denied for Second Chance please post and tag Spencer Varanin for review.<br /><br />Thank you!</p>