Bullets and power-cells
I've noticed with corvettes within the 100-199 meter size range, that the hangar rating is skewed and is not linear with the rest of the sizes that follow after it in regard to balancing the submission or in starfighter capacity.
For submissions above a mass produced rate of production, this is likely not an issue and I would otherwise ignore it to move on with life. In the end this is all for fun and doesn't amount to anything in the end besides having a neat boat to have in your repertoire. But it's been in the back of my head for a long time now after this submission was flagged for the hangar rating and has made me avoid this size of ship altogether.
I pose this question for discussion.
Should the Hangar Rating for 100-199 meter ships be changed to this-
- 50m [Base: 0 | Very Low: 0 | Low: 0 | Average: 0 | High: 0 | Very High: 0 | Extreme: 0 ]
- 100m [Base: 0 | Very Low: 0 | Low: 0 | Average: 0 | High: 0 | Very High: 1 | Extreme: 2 ]
- 200m [Base: 0 | Very Low: 0 | Low: 0 | Average: 1 | High: 2 | Very High: 3 | Extreme: 4 ]
For submissions above a mass produced rate of production, this is likely not an issue and I would otherwise ignore it to move on with life. In the end this is all for fun and doesn't amount to anything in the end besides having a neat boat to have in your repertoire. But it's been in the back of my head for a long time now after this submission was flagged for the hangar rating and has made me avoid this size of ship altogether.
I pose this question for discussion.
Should the Hangar Rating for 100-199 meter ships be changed to this-
100m [Base: 0 | Very Low: 0 | Low: 0 | Average: 0 | High: 1 | Very High: 2 | Extreme: 3 ]