Longhammer Heavy Cruiser

[RC 212]

Image Source: Here
Affiliation: Open Market
Model: Heavy Cruiser
Modularity: No
Production: Minor
Material: Duranium, Durasteel, Quadanium
Classification: Assault

Length: 750m
Width: 200m
Height: 200
Armament:

50x Heavy Turbolasers

20x Point Defense Cannons

10x Ion Cannon

10x Proton Missile Tubes- 50X Munitions Each

Hangar: 3 Squadrons of Fighters

Special Features:

Isotope-5 Reactor

Deflector Shields

Life Support

Nav Computer

Hyperdrive

Escape Pods

Drop Pods

Maneuverability Rating: 13
Speed Rating: 13
Hyperdrive Class: 5

Strengths:

Heavily Armed
Weaknesses:

Slower than Average

Small Fighter Count

Lack of any major point defenses

Description: Realizing the need for heavier weapons of war, Ticon Defence Industries set about to create a hard hitter. A cruiser that packed a punch. While she is nothing special this baby was loaded with as much weapons as possible and had all other systems scrapped to a minimal, including hangars.

The major firepower of the Heavy Cruiser brings a lot to bear on the enemy. Used normally in groups of threes , they have the ability to out a severe dent in enemy forces. Add in some air defence and support vessels and these babies are almost as effective as small star destroyers and for much cheaper a cost.

As always with Longhammers vessels, Colap Ticons signature Isotope-5 reactor provides tremendous power, allowing the Heavy Cruiser to run all systems at full strength and one at double.

Who Can Use This: Anyone

 

[Camellia Swift]

[member="Colap Ticon"]

Neither weakness is really a weakness. The speed is average and you have the max squadrons for a ship this size. The description is also lacking and I would like at least a full paragraph or two. Everything else checks in.

 

[RC 212]

[member="Camellia Swift"]
Edited as requested. If your still unsatisfied I would ask for suggestions for weaknesses.

 

[Camellia Swift]

[member="Colap Ticon"]

Well for both this sub and the corvette I think you should put in the canon weaknesses of the Isotope-5 reactors. Mainly how they are incredibly unstable. They were also very expensive, but as your sub for the reactor shows you do have a source and this is a finite product.

And please remove the weaknesses I mentioned last time since they aren't actually weaknesses.

 

[Soliath Devin Talith]

[member="Camellia Swift"] [member="Colap Ticon"]

Please respond to the FJ within 24 hours or this will be archived.